what i thought today

All clear
They choice was be pick. If jude by mews
don't remove the typo because judging by the news is exactly meow.
Ok here my sadlyangry a meow.
They target are will be keep still stand
That how was be  that will the same
it exactly : for each country state  let get a local own dictature
with own a dictator ofcourse.
And at them who accept and at them who don’t accept
A state governmeant structure in they heads
Without except.

Wtf? They do strong it that could be do broken.
But the carately structures kinda a empaery reside in they heads
Sitizens its head from there not a exit out.
And a debate about a whose dictathouse are best
But no one doubt in total needs a structure.
That a official of gowermeant say the rot about a peole.
Go away fat ass I’ll sid in you place.
----------------------
if you hired a management team and they bankrupted your firm.
and now they call the owners rotten.
and they've transferred all the assets to themselves.
while claiming it's the government's approach to management.

Do I have some kind of government in my head, too?
Yeah, it's possible
but I hope it has a purely decorative role.
take a closer look at the dictatorship in your head
you'll have to look for it and you won't find it.
yes, Ouija, I'll call you Pinochet now.

this state zoning of space is ineradicably similar to human consciousness in general.
or is it possible?
in the non-human aspect - ceased to be a man - there is no more pen for cattle.
I doubt it, management is just a delicate matter.
for example, in my head there is real democracy and freedom of speech. try to say something contrary and I, Ouija, will immediately put you in jail.
and how are you different from those then whom you criticize?

a dull topic, I'm just wasting my time
these arguments are all in the context of governance is dictatorship. and the context is not set by you, but you have accepted it as an axiom that does not require proof, which means that your kungfu is just posturing - your mind is not flexible.
If I were a mattress, I'd at least have shock-absorbing springs.
I'm saying change the context if it doesn't suit you.
But you chose the idea of statehood in general and you've been arguing for an hour why it's a repressive machine. Because any state is a repressive machine.
What else is there to think about?
You can talk about the injustices of the world to show everyone what an idiot you are.
and you must have at least eight variants of a unique context. of which you have not asked yourself any, but you are rolling around like a piece of fat on a hot griddle of someone else's context.
thank you, nlp pinochet.
You didn't invent the nlp context either.
I'll think in the context of phenomena, then.
Phenomena is what's right in front of your face! Don't try to draw the shadow of the world order if you're standing in it.
The shadow of the earth?
25 frames of hand-drawn animation of the moon is not interesting to anyone, it gets boring fast.
Also.
Are we in the casino now?
What are the stakes?
As always, the stakes are life.
Contexts are not dealt as cards to the players.
Each player brings them with him.
Cheaters.
Of course. That's what the game is all about.
strange ideas you outline today, Ouija.
this is your quadruple shadow on the table outlined.
But your thoughts have exclusively human outlines today, almost civil, so to speak.
I tried to outline the general shock in the information field.
in the information field, so as not to outline, only quadruple windows of someone's views will turn out. there are no ideas from the point of view of phenomena here.
Professor Ouija asked us not to even approach phenomenology.
this is no longer his context.

ok the third new context will be like this
"everything that concerns us does not concern us"
I clearly see this new outline.
this is such an old context that it is not even an outline but a tattered stencil.
no need to invent the task is to simply describe what is, this is what is going to form a truly new idea.

you're wasting time again on your stupid reasoning.
I've been doing this my whole life.
when I was little I scratched some colored pencils into a glass of water and waited a long time for something to come in.
it was a chemical experiment with a predetermined result - zero.
well, they were floating there.
yes, like your reasoning on issues of world humanism today
don't do it anymore, it's not productive.

you could have enriched yourself with English during this time, but instead you spent it on your native language.
google doesn't care, it will write in any letters. It doesn't matter to anyone else either.
but it should not be indifferent to you.
who says this anyway?

I will definitely buy a drink tomorrow because the sober direction of my thoughts seems very not sober.

yes, it has slid towards social contradictions. Roll this stone back now, Sisyphus!
I'll probably leave this stone here by the slope, in case someone else needs it.

like that demon trap for Sun Wukong, this load gradually became heavier than a mountain and almost crushed him,
but he was smart, so was I.
Sun Wukong was a demon himself
well, yes.
.