Roosevelt, Truman, Churchill and Stalin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhTgVEmh93I
Yalta, the twilight of the giants

In Yalta, in February 1945, Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin, the leaders of the three great powers allied against Nazism, met to imagine the post-war period, during one of the most important international conferences of all time.

***

Stalin vs Truman
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eYzmO1udt4
Stalin vs Truman: The Origins of the Cold War (Documentary in english)
2023
This is the story of a face-off that pitted the two most powerful men on the planet for eight years: Stalin, the leader of the Soviet Union, and Truman, the president of the United States. This confrontation held the world in suspense and led them to the cold war.
When Truman came to power in the spring of 1945, with World War II still not over, the United States and the Soviet Union were allies and fought together against Nazi Germany. But, once Hitler wa …


***
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe75qLB0TP0
Сталин против Трумэна/Евгений Спицын
2023
  Фестивали «Цифровой истории»
На московском фестивале Евгений Спицын рассказал о событиях, ознаменовавших начало Холодной войны. Кто на самом деле предложил опустить «железный занавес»? Каков изначально был план Сталина относительно послевоенной восточной Европы и почему сценарий изменился?
#цифроваяистория #фестивальци #сталин #егоряковлев #ЕвгенийСпицынЦИ …
808 Comments

***
Rimland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other uses, see Rimland (surname).

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Rimland" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (February 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Map of world with Rimland and Heartland's theories
The Rimland is a concept championed in the early 20th century by Nicholas John Spykman, professor of international relations at Yale University. To him, geopolitics is the planning of the security policy of a country in terms of its geographical factors. He described the maritime fringe of a country or continent; in particular the densely populated western, southern, and eastern edges of the Eurasian continent.

He criticized Mackinder for overrating the Heartland as being of immense strategic importance due to its vast size, central geographical location and supremacy of land power rather than sea power. He assumed that the Heartland will not be a potential hub of Europe, because:

Western Russia was then an agrarian society
Bases of industrialization were found to the west of the Ural mountains.
This area is ringed to the north, east, south, and south-west by some of the greater obstacles to transportation (ice and freezing temperature, lowering mountains etc.).
There has never really been a simple land power–sea power opposition.
Spykman thought that the Rimland, the strip of coastal land that encircles Eurasia, is more important than the central Asian zone (the so-called Heartland) for the control of the Eurasian continent. Spykman's vision is at the base of the "containment politics" put into effect by the United States in its relation/position to the Soviet Union during the post-World War II period.[citation needed]

Thus, 'Heartland' appeared to him to be less important in comparison to 'Rimland.'

Concept
According to Spykman, "Who controls the Rimland rules Eurasia, who rules Eurasia controls the destinies of the world."

The Rimland, Halford Mackinder's "Inner or Marginal Crescent", was divided into three sections:

The European coast land;
The Arabian-Middle Eastern desert land; and,
The Asiatic monsoon land.
Rimland or inner crescent contains most of world's people as well as large share of world's resources. Rimland is in between Heartland and marginal seas, so it was more important than Heartland. It included Asia minor, Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan, South East Asia, China, Korea and East Siberia except Russia.

All the aforesaid countries lie in the buffer zone that is between sea power and land power.

Rimland countries were amphibian states, surrounding the Eurasian continents.

While Spykman accepts the first two as defined, he rejects the simple grouping of the Asian countries into one "monsoon land." India, the Indian Ocean littoral, and Indian culture were geographically and civilizationally separate from the Chinese lands.

The Rimland's defining characteristic is that it is an intermediate region, lying between the heartland and the marginal sea powers. As the amphibious buffer zone between the land powers and sea powers, it must defend itself from both sides, and therein lies its fundamental security problems. Spykman's conception of the Rimland bears greater resemblance to Alfred Thayer Mahan's "debated and debatable zone" than to Mackinder's inner or marginal crescent.

The Rimland has great importance coming from its demographic weight, natural resources, and industrial development. Spykman sees this importance as the reason that the Rimland will be crucial to containing the Heartland (whereas Mackinder had believed that the Outer or Insular Crescent would be the most important factor in the Heartland's containment).

Applicability and variations
Spykman called for the consolidation of the Rimland countries to ensure their survival during World War II. With the defeat of Germany and the emergence of the USSR, Spykman's views were embraced during the formulation of the Cold War American policy of containing communist influence.

But as the states within the Rimland had varying degree of independence, and a variety of races, and culture, it did not come under the control of any single power.

Dr Spyros Katsoulas introduces the concept of the Rimland Bridge to describe the hinge between Europe and Asia, where Greece, Cyprus, and Turkey are located.[1] The purpose of the new term is not to contradict, but rather to supplement Spykman's theory, and highlight the special strategic significance of the Eastern Mediterranean, as well as its inherent instability.

The Rimland Bridge is defined as the buffer and transit zone that connects the European and Asian parts of Rimland and has three major characteristics. It simultaneously acts as a strategic chokepoint and a valuable gateway, but also as a dangerous shatter belt (geopolitics) due to the enduring Greek–Turkish rivalry.

Criticism
It was a self-fulfilling prophecy.
In his concept of air power he did not include the use of modern missiles with nuclear warheads.
The Rimland is not a region but a unit, otherwise the epitome of geographical diversity.
The Rimland-Theory is biased against Asian countries.
The Rimland-Theory does not take into account the various conflicts going on between its different countries (India vs. Pakistan, etc.)
See also
The Geographical Pivot of History (Theory of Heartland)
Core–periphery
Intermediate Region
Island chain strategy
Shatter belt (geopolitics)
Further reading
Library resources about
Rimland
Resources in your library
Resources in other libraries
Sloan, Geoffrey R. (1988). Geopolitics in United States Strategic Policy, 1890–1987. Harvester Wheatsheaf. pp. 16–19. ISBN 9780745004181.
References
 Katsoulas, Spyros (2022). "Ch. 2: The geopolitical context". The United States and Greek-Turkish Relations: the Guardian's Dilemma. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 9781032123370.
Categories: Political terminology of the United StatesGeopolitics
This page was last edited on 13 January 2024, at 16:14 (UTC).
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Pri