Liliputin - 4540

The smoking gun on the Grassy knoll was conveniently ignored by LBJ und his lackey Earl Warren ... "
JFK


Liliputins. What, the heck, is this?
http://stihi.ru/2021/11/24/7101


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ltg2RgHlsQ

Assassination of John F. Kennedy
Encyclopedia Britannica
Assassination of John F. Kennedy, mortal shooting of John F. Kennedy, the 35th president of the United States, as he rode in a motorcade in Dallas, Texas, on November 22, 1963. His accused killer was Lee Harvey Oswald, a former U.S. Marine who had embraced Marxism and defected for a time to the Soviet Union.

***
Was the smoking gun on the Grassy knoll  conveniently ignored by LBJ und his lackey Earl Warren?

Whether or not there was a "smoking gun" on the grassy knoll that was conveniently ignored by Lyndon B. Johnson and Earl Warren is a matter of debate. Some people believe that there is strong evidence to suggest that there was a second gunman on the grassy knoll, while others believe that the Warren Commission's findings, which concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, are correct.

Those who believe that there was a second gunman on the grassy knoll point to the following evidence:

The Zapruder film, which shows the President's head being jerked back and to the left, suggesting that the fatal shot came from the front.

The testimony of eyewitnesses who said that they heard shots coming from the grassy knoll.
The discovery of a bullet fragment on the grassy knoll.
The fact that Oswald's rifle was not powerful enough to have caused the President's head to be blown back as it was.
Those who believe that the Warren Commission's findings are correct argue that:

The Zapruder film is inconclusive and can be interpreted in different ways.
The eyewitness testimony is unreliable.
The bullet fragment on the grassy knoll could have come from other sources.
Oswald's rifle was powerful enough to have caused the President's head to be blown back.
The Warren Commission's findings have been criticized by many people, including some members of the commission itself. However, the commission's findings have never been officially overturned, and there is no consensus on whether or not there was a second gunman on the grassy knoll.

Whether or not LBJ and Earl Warren conveniently ignored evidence of a second gunman is also a matter of debate. Some people believe that they did, while others believe that they were simply acting on the best evidence that was available to them at the time.

Ultimately, the question of whether or not there was a smoking gun on the grassy knoll is one that may never be definitively answered.

***
Whether or not the "smoking gun" on the grassy knoll was conveniently ignored by Lyndon B. Johnson (LBJ) and Earl Warren is a matter of debate. Some people believe that there is strong evidence that there was a second gunman on the grassy knoll, and that this evidence was suppressed by the Warren Commission, which was headed by Warren. Others believe that the evidence for a second gunman is weak, and that the Warren Commission's conclusion that Oswald acted alone is correct.

There is no definitive answer to this question, as the evidence is inconclusive. However, there are a number of factors that suggest that LBJ and Warren may have been motivated to ignore any evidence that pointed to a conspiracy. For example, LBJ was the Vice President at the time of the assassination, and he would have become President if Kennedy had not been killed. This gave him a vested interest in ensuring that the assassination was not seen as a conspiracy, as this could have damaged his presidency.

Warren was also a powerful figure in the establishment, and he may have been reluctant to believe that the assassination was the work of a conspiracy. He may have also been influenced by the fact that the Warren Commission was composed of mostly establishment figures, who may have been biased against the idea of a conspiracy.

Ultimately, it is impossible to know for sure whether or not the "smoking gun" on the grassy knoll was conveniently ignored by LBJ and Warren. However, the evidence suggests that it is at least a possibility.

Here are some of the evidence that is cited by those who believe that there was a second gunman on the grassy knoll:

Several witnesses reported hearing shots from the grassy knoll.
Some witnesses reported seeing a puff of smoke coming from the grassy knoll.
The Zapruder film shows the President's head being thrown back and to the left, which some experts believe could only have been caused by a shot from the front.
The Warren Commission's own investigation found that there was a "high probability" that a second gunman fired at the President.
However, the Warren Commission concluded that Oswald acted alone, and their findings have been supported by subsequent investigations. The evidence for a second gunman is circumstantial, and there is no definitive proof that it exists.

The question of whether or not the "smoking gun" on the grassy knoll was conveniently ignored by LBJ and Warren is likely to remain a matter of debate for many years to come.

***
Whether or not there was a "smoking gun" on the Grassy Knoll is a matter of debate. Some people believe that there is strong evidence to suggest that there was a second gunman, while others believe that the Warren Commission's conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone is correct.

Those who believe that there was a second gunman point to the following evidence:

The Zapruder film, which shows Kennedy's head and upper body being violently jerked back and to the left, suggesting that the fatal shot came from the front.
The testimony of eyewitnesses who heard gunshots coming from the grassy knoll.
The discovery of bullet fragments in the grassy knoll.
The fact that Oswald's rifle was not powerful enough to cause the fatal wound to Kennedy's head.
Those who believe that Oswald acted alone argue that:

The Zapruder film can be interpreted in different ways.
The eyewitnesses who reported hearing gunshots from the grassy knoll were mistaken.
The bullet fragments found in the grassy knoll could have been from Oswald's rifle.
Oswald had the opportunity and motive to kill Kennedy.
The Warren Commission concluded that Oswald acted alone, but its findings have been disputed by many people. The possibility that there was a second gunman on the Grassy Knoll remains a topic of debate.

As for whether or not LBJ and Earl Warren conveniently ignored any evidence, that is also a matter of speculation. Some people believe that they did, while others believe that they acted in good faith. There is no definitive answer to this question.