We have a negative papirus that can be criticized

 


The criticized papirus which is wrong

Expression of cyanobacterial ictB in higher plants enhanced photosynthesis and growth
J Lieman-Hurwitz, L Asipov(ME), S Rachmilevitch, Y Marcus, A Kaplan
Plant responses to air pollution and global change, 133-139

AND THE CRITICIZM
LATELY STEPASHKA AND PUT MONARCHYST JOINED MY OPINION

Formal criticizm papirus

Field-grown ictB tobacco transformants show no difference
in photosynthetic efficiency for biomass relative to the wild
type
Ursula M. Ruiz-Vera1,†,‡, , Liana G. Acevedo-Siaca1,†,§, , Kenny L. Brown2,¶, , Chidi Afamefule2, ,
Hussein Gherli2, , Andrew J. Simkin3,4, , Stephen P. Long1,5, , , Tracy Lawson2, and
Christine A. Raines2, 2022

And it is mine I preceded my opinion waz proven
Expression of cyanobacterial ictB in higher plants did not enhance photosynthesis. Leonid Ledata 2014

FAILING KAKADEMIC KKKPLAN ARON TO DISQUALIFICATION
(KARENINA WILL CRY)