На каждого умного по дураку...

Всё поровну, всё спаведливо.
Б.Окуджава


От имени мировой общественности выношу гражданину Б.Окуджаве строгий выговор с предупреждением о недопустимости введения указанной общественности в заблуждение! Никто до сего момента не считал, сколько в точности дураков приходится на одного умного.
Это сделал, по мере слабых сил и ума своего,  я,  – Эспри де Л'Эскалье!

Вчера на портале «ФОКСНЬЮС» я прочитал статью некого китайского эксперта о панацее от их вируса в виде ношения маски (на лице, ибо по инструкции маску не следует надевать ни на какие-либо другие части тела!).
По его, эксперта, данным 75-80% людей носивших маски НЕ ЗАРАЗИЛИСЬ вирусом!!!
УРА!!!
Я же написал к этой высоконаучной статье свой совершенно ненаучный, ни на какой-либо точной статистике не основанный, коротенький и ругательный, признаюсь, не удержался, комментарий.
См ниже:

Victorious stupidity and lies!


Wearing a face mask can reduce coronavirus transmission by up to 75 percent, study says
By David Aaro |

Eric Shawn: Wear a mask
Rep. Mike Gallagher says it is a small price to pay to reopen the economy.
Get all the latest news on coronavirus and more delivered daily to your inbox. Sign up here.

Researchers have found that wearing surgical masks can significantly reduce the rate of airborne COVID-19 transmission, according to a study released on Sunday.
The study, conducted by a team of scientists in Hong Kong, found the rate of non-contact transmission through respiratory droplets or airborne particles dropped by as much as 75 percent when masks were used.
“The findings implied to the world and the public is that the effectiveness of mask-wearing against the coronavirus pandemic is huge,” said Dr. Yuen Kwok-yung, a leading microbiologist from Hong Kong University who helped discover the SARS virus back in 2003.
CORONAVIRUS INFECTIONS WOULD PLUNGE IF 80 PERCENT OF PEOPLE WORE MASKS, STUDY SAYS


 
Customers wearing protective masks from the coronavirus and keeping social distancing space line up to enter a Costco Wholesale store in the Van Nuys section of Los Angeles on Saturday. (AP Photo/Richard Vogel)
It was released by the department of microbiology at the University of Hong Kong and comes as world leaders, including the World Health Organization (WHO), have questioned the effectiveness of face coverings outside of medical settings.
The study, described as a first of its kind, placed hamsters in two cages, with one of the groups infected with COVID-19 and the other being healthy. They placed the animals in three different scenarios to analyze the effectiveness of the face coverings.
In one scenario the mask barriers were placed only on cages with the infected subjects, another saw the masks covering the healthy subjects, and the third saw with no mask barriers at all. For all of the scenarios, a fan was placed between the cages to allow for the transmission of respiratory droplets.
They found that when the mask was placed over the infected cage the infection rate dropped to just over 15 percent.
That infection rate went up to 33 percent when the mask barrier was only used to cover the healthy hamsters’ cage.
With no mask barriers at all, roughly two-thirds of the healthy hamsters were infected with the virus within a week, the study found.
Researchers added that the hamsters who were infected even with the mask barrier had less of the virus in their bodies when compared to those infected without the masks.
"In our hamster experiment, it shows very clearly that if infected hamsters or humans -- especially asymptomatic or symptomatic ones -- put on masks, they actually protect other people," Yuen said in a press conference on Sunday, according to Sky News.
"That's the strongest result we showed here. Transmission can be reduced by 50 percent when surgical masks are used, especially when masks are worn by infected individuals."
He said up until we have a vaccine for the virus, what remains practical is either social distancing or wearing a mask.
Last month, a separate study published by a group of international experts, created a model that shows cases of the virus could be cut significantly if "(near) universal masking" is adopted.
"Universal masking at 80 [percent] adoption flattens the curve significantly more than maintaining a strict lockdown," researchers wrote in the study, which has not yet been peer-reviewed, as of last week.
"Masking at only 50 [percent] adoption is not sufficient to prevent continued spread," the researchers added. "Replacing the strict lockdown with social distancing on May 31 without masking results in unchecked spread."
Fox News' Chris Ciaccia contributed to this report

My commentary.

Only idiots can make such a fake  study and only DOUBLE idiots can believe in  it.
Pores in mask are 60 to 500 microns in diameter. (Micron is one millionth of meter)
Viruses are 20 to 400 nanometers ”large”. (Nanometer is one billionth of meter).
This means that viruses are 4000 to 1250 times smaller than pores. The same is comparison between ant and large opened door!
Besides that, mask NEVER can be attached HERMETICALLY to the face leaving huge gaps between them so not only virus but big cockroaches can enter there easily!
Foolish and impudent lies that only morons deserve it!
Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur!

Найти его сегодня среди почти пяти с половиной тысяч других отзывов и комментариев я не смог.  И подумал, что модераторы его удалили за ненадобностью: Зачем смущать невинные души страждущих-жаждущих знаний всякими циничными комментариями и обзывалками?! Но, случайно нажав на какую-то кнопку на экране, я вдруг увидел, что ДВОИМ ЧИТАТЕЛЯМ  мой комментарий «ПОНРАВИЛСЯ»!
Поскольку далеко не все читатели утруждают себя написанием комментариев, предположим, что в среднем один из пяти читателей всё же оставил свою заметку. Отсюда получаем примерное число читателей этой статьи  27.5 тысяч читателей. Коль скоро двое из этого числа нашли мой комментарий «нравящимся», из этого следует, что ОДИН РАЗУМНЫЙ ЧЕЛОВЕК (из знающих английский или китайский) приходится на 13.750 дураков!!!
Стыд и позор Гр. Б.Окуждаве, так бессовестно перевравшему фактические данные!
Вообще-то, соотношение очень хорошее, я-то по наивности думал о числах куда бОльших!
21 V 2020