The argument of design
The argument of design. Why it is called argument, but not a scientific proof? The method of science called "methodological naturalism" excludes from peer-review discussion (however, the arXiv includes the non-peer-review one) the theological face of reality. Thus, there can not be the "scientific" proof of God. And since the definition of Science is the "quest for Knowledge", the proof of God can not be named even a "proof". Thus, remains the word "argument". But latter is from the verb "to argue". Latter suggests, that the atheists are not crazy at all, but have valid (in the eyes of God) position in the known debates. Thus, the atheists will not be punished in hell.
Any change to that simple line of thought is not possible due to the satan's dictatorship over the Earth. What to do? Just forget about the imperfect notions and failing terms and read the following text with open mind of a truth-seeker.
The watch in the forest. Of course, because we are used to the thought, that any watch is made by watchmaker, not God, the found watch in the forest will not be associated with God, but with a human. But nevertheless, what the watch in the forest teaches us? It teaches us, that (as Newton ones demonstrated) nature is not a chaos. There is order in nature. And the transition between pre-historic chaos (latter includes absence of running time and space) into ordered life (with all its libraries, churches, institutes, galleries, love and dresses) needs either the God, or the wonder (wonder is defined as an exclusion from the every-day laws), and, thus, the Wonder-maker is needed.
The Dr. Stephen Hawking has understood it and tried to solve it in bestseller "Grand Design" by writing "because there is law like gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing."
What did the Stephen by that wording? He simply named the wonder of Big Bang as the law of nature. But there is logical conflict: a law holds at any time and in any place, but Big Bang would happened only once.
Design is another word for the order: yes, it is not a human to design the snowflakes, but the God Himself. He has designed the laws and matter to form in the end the snowflakes.
Someone strange argues, that it is not proven, that we have any order at all. But, there is Bible. It is book. It has ordered sentences.
Thus, there is order in nature, look: for atheists the humans are just part of nature. Thus, for atheists even a design (made by humans, so made by nature) is in nature. Who made the designed then nature?!
The Multiverse, the seeding life on Earth aliens with UFOes, the many-world interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, are to explain the chaos-order transitions (not only at beginning of time, but also at the starts of life and the intelligent life). But due to the local character of the entropy of Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics, the other universes can not influence the chaos-order problems in our Universe.
The Spirit of Creation is God, and the God is the Spirit of Creation. As well as Love is God, God is Love; Truth is God, God is Truth; Wisdom is God and God is Wisdom. God is Spirit of. Spirit of order and design. And yes, all what exists is designed and ordered. Why? It is always the Son (Read it "Son", not Sun as in here): "The Stranglers - Always The Sun"
https://youtu.be/cYQTL-ws6p4
Opponent: "world is complicated, so the Creator must be more complicated. Then who has created the Creator? By the way, there are millions gods and hundreds of religions, what advise you give to an atheist to find the true God and the true Religion? By the way, the God of the Old Testament is evil."
You are mixing two different questions: 1. does God exist? 2. what to know about Him? It is violation of Aristotle Logic. Thus, concentrate yourself on the first question. Then, after meeting the God, you soon will get correct knowledge. You will understand then, that He is not evil at all! I asked: "is the world created?" After getting the answer, we can find out something about the Creator.
Knowledge (even hidden) must someone know. Therefore, there is the all-knowing God.
Consider the possibility of the existence of an omniscient God.
If such exists, then He knows about His existence.
Therefore, at the moment there is a hidden knowledge of the existence of God.
Q.E.D.
One can argue that a person, although he does not know everything, but at least he knows about own existence. No! Only the All-Knowing can surely know that he himself is not an illusion. Illusion is a violation of the logic of Aristotle. If logic somewhere in the universe is broken, then you are an illusion yourself. Attempt to explain the Big Bang led to the conclusion that there is no Reality: see video, that "the universe does not exist" from Dr. Michio Kaku. Therefore, the Universe needs the Creator.
Here, through prayer to God, He shared with me the knowledge of the Fermat Last Theorem, Black Holes, Energy, and Dark Matter:
http://vixra.org/abs/1907.0398
But there is the problem called "self-deception". Look how that is possible: the Flying Spaghetti Monster was just an "innocent" trolling of religion, but now it is a new religion itself. The members do know, that spaghetti is not God and not even alive, but never saying that: "show must go on!"
Opponent: "Knowledge (even hidden) must someone know. Therefore, there is the all-knowing tiny, pink, invisible elephant in my backyard."
You have just started the "glorious" way of a new world religion: the church of tiny, pink, invisible elephant. However, as written above, there are hundreds of religions and new ones are being added every day. But you are mixing two questions: 1. Is there God? 2. What we know about Him? As atheist, you must concentrate yourself on the first one. Try correctly answer the question: "is the world created?". In the sense, the atheism is different from Theism only by matter of Love. Love your God, - says the Bible.
Свидетельство о публикации №119080206092