Chronicles of rejections

Advising journal submitters or
Chronicles of rejections or
Unified theory of all
 
Уважаемая редакция, когда будете писать отказное письмо сыну героини блокады Ленинграда и внуку павшего героя защиты Ленинграда, то пожалуйста вспомните в какой стране зарегистрирован ваш журнал и утешьте тёплым отказным словом внука героев России и –в принципе то- всей Вселенной. Так что-бы даже Медведь прослезился!
Как журналы отвечают героям-освободителям

Дорогие ветераны,
Уважаю Вас за раны.

Вы сражались за меня ?!
Проливали кровь вы зря!

Извините за отказ -
Журнал физиков у нас!

Отдыхай спокойным сном,
И не думай ни о чём!

Мы тебе закроем рот -
Только пикнешь - и в капот!

И зальём водою пасть -
Ведь с моста можешь упасть!

Ты усёк, старик, меня ?
Физика -брат- не твоя!

Отдыхай спокойным сном,
И не думай ни о чём!

Copyright: Дмитрий Мартила, 2010
Свидетельство о публикации №11006044428

ОТВЕТЫ РОССИЙСКИХ РЕДАКЦИЙ
ISSN 1090-6509 [Согласно общему положению, в Ж. публикует статьи, которые представляют собой оригинальные результаты и вносят существенный вклад в одну из областей физики. К сожалению, мы не можем принять к рассмотрению Вашу работу]
ISSN 0021-3640 [Ваша статья "Unified theory of all" была рассмотрена на заседании Редколлегии от 3.06.2010. Редколлегия считает, что данная статья по своему содержанию не соответствует профилю журнала]

МОЙ ИМ ОТВЕТ + ТО СТИХОТВОРЕНИЕ
Ув. Редколлегия, я оценил ваши совместные усилия по утешению. Может быть даже сегодня я и мои военные герои забудутся самым глубоким спокойным сном. А всё же жаль, что во всей вашей Редколлегии не нашлось ни одного поэта или лирика. Берите пример с меня -- как вы уже начинаете понимать, я успешно объединяю лирику и физику.
Думаю, что и другие Российские редколлегии и просто инстанции оценят ваши письма героям России. Даже Медведь прослезится (одного такого я видел на mail ru).
ОТВЕТЫ РЕДАКЦИЙ
ISSN 1090-6509  [no answer];  ISSN 1063-7737 [no answer]; 
ISSN 0021-3640  [no answer];  ISSN 1560-7488 [no answer];
ISSN 0040-5779 [Глубокоуважаемый Dmitri Martila, К сожалению, Ваша статья не представляет интереса.. и не может быть опубликована. Искренне Ваш..]


THE BEGINNING OF THE PAPER
Dmitri Martila, Tartu University, Institute of Physics, Field Lab, 9-51 L;;ne Street, 50605 Tartu, Estonia, dmart@hot.ee, www.hot.ee/dmart
ABSTRACT
Discussed question, why sometimes gifted papers are being rejected by our top journals. As one of working examples, is presented my rejected theory of naked singularity on the horizon of any black hole. Strict proofs but simple (without any formulas). Let's define, that existing everything compounds the closed system. Conclusion derived, that our material world is opened system, and these rejections come, because the papers are already appeared in the System, which is closed one. Any opened system is always a part of the closed System.
 
The discovery

ABSTRACT: In the form of introductory Letter, is lightened new possibility on occurrence of hypothetical naked singularities in nature. Without protecting us cover, they are considered to be the most fearful material objects. Do you still remember TV News about possible black hole production inside the Collider? I've bullet-proof proofs, that any black hole is infinitely much more dangerous, than we think. After reading my paper, you certainly do not want any „micro” black hole here, on Earth! Remember practically infinite powerful „Gamma-ray bursts” known to astronomy, but completely puzzling the theoreticians? Thus, in any outcome, this Letter will find resonant in the public.
PACS   89.20.Dd, 88.05.Ec, 04.20.Cv, 04.20.Dw, 95.30.Sf

BODY: The event horizon – is imaginable surface of black hole. Is obvious, that outer electromagnetic field (e.g. the microwave background radiation) has infinite (i.e. singular) intensity directly on the event horizon of black hole, due to gravitational blue shift [1]. Thus, one won’t sin to say: „there’s the true singularity on the horizon of any black hole”. More astonishingly: it’s the so called naked, fearful one.

One of the most intriguing astronomical puzzles is so called short Gamma-ray bursts. During couple seconds releases so much energy, that our Sun produces during ten billions of years. The mechanism, how so shortly in very small volume of space origins so much energy – is completely unknown [2].

As says Pankaj Joshi to Scientific American: „one of the most important unsolved problems in astrophysics. Opening of naked singularities could change the search strategy unified theory of all physical interactions and not only because of the possibility of direct observational tests of this theory” [3].

Any matter curves the space-time (Einstein’s General Relativity). Thus, obviously, singular matter fields (electromagnetic waves) will inevitably produce the curvature singularity.

SUMMARY: This is only one way how to enrich our life by recognizing the naked curvature singularity. I must say, that there are alternatives how to free your mind from super misleading called „coordinate singularity”. I’ve already got detailed mathematical proofs with applications, but I’m waiting for some serious journal to publish this introductory Letter. Read further news on hot.ee/dmart

Detailed correspondence with journals on the discovery
(also always have being included in the submitted paper)

For me it’s very unlikely to accept a journal (the acceptation or rejection is mutual, as it is in any kind of relationship). With of without help of leading journals, this letter advertised will find resonant in the general public. Because, despite of Crisis, gay parades and loosing Jobs, people still pay attention to possibility of black hole production in LHC Collider. Well, are you shore, does a Tax Payer want to support a completely unstudied naked singularity, starting in Geneva? On his own account, while epoch of Crisis?

Are some journals actually reading every manuscript they receive? Perhaps journals are impotent to serve us, the tax payers? Would it take too much time and, thus, only manuscripts from old friends and familiar authors are being opened and red? They themselves wrote „the system may suggest possible answers” in their „help” section. Why else I’ve received following rejections, obviously generated not by humans, but by automatic systems:

ISSN 0027-8424 [We receive many more good papers than we can publish and the Board must carefully weigh which papers merit external review. The Board concluded that while interesting, your paper lacked the broad appeal (NAKED SINGULARITY DESTROYING EARTH IS NOT BROAD ENOUGH FOR 0027-8424???) necessary for further consideration by the journal]

ISSN 0028-0836 [while your findings may well prove stimulating to others' thinking about such questions, I regret that we are unable to conclude that the work provides the sort of firm advance in general understanding that would warrant publication in Nature. We therefore feel that the paper would find a more suitable outlet in a specialist (SWEETLY TALKING EDITOR, YOU’RE SEEING HERE BUNCH OF SPECIAL EQUATIONs AND FORMULAs? The TAX PAYERS CAN’T SEE!!!) journal]

ISSN 0036-8075 [Because your manuscript was not given a high priority rating during the initial screening process, we will not be able to send it out for in-depth review. Although your analysis is interesting, we feel that the scope and focus of your paper make it more appropriate for a more specialized (?!) journal… our decision is not necessarily a reflection of the quality of your research but rather of our stringent space limitations (THE SPACE?! THIS PARTICULAR PAPER CONSUMES ALLMOST NOTHING OF SPACE!!!)]

ISSN 0031-9007 [it is not suitable for publication in any.. journal]

ISSN 1550-7998 [The editor of ISSN 0031-9007 has already informed you that this paper is not suitable for publication in any.. journal. We reaffirm that decision and inform you that we will consider this paper no further]

ISSN 1090-6509 [do not meet the level of development of modern physics]

ISSN 2072-0297 [no answer]

Correspondence with ISSN 0295-5075

Dear Mr. Martila, The Co-Editor, Professor R., has read carefully your paper and came to the conclusion that it does not meet the criteria set by JOURNAL. JOURNAL in its refereeing process considers only papers that present substantial factual progress in theory or experiment in physics.

Dear editors of JOURNAL, proved naked singularity in the centre of our Galaxy is certainly an "advance in physics". So please tell me your real reasons of rejection. I will submit them to J.W.J to go all over the world. Really guys, have you red my paper?

Dear Mr. Martila, We have received your response. In spite of your complaints, JOURNAL is keeping its decision that your paper cannot be published in a scientific letter journal like JOURNAL. JOURNAL is restricted to publishing scientifically sound experimental or theoretical results and neither utter opinion nor speculation. JOURNAL will not interfere if you submit your paper anywhere else.  But JOURNAL does not provide a forum for exclamations of any kind. We would like to inform you that JOURNAL reserves the right not to work with authors who are abusive towards staff, referees, Editors or authors of other papers.

Dear editors of JOURNAL, I am thankful, that you felt for me. But I felt also the sorry, that you felt being abused. You wrote that there is the "speculation". Thus, you have confirmed, that my paper includes the "advance in physics". Because the known things are certainly not "speculations". Therefore, the paper has novel information. The paper is only an introductory letter, I promise JOURNAL, that after acceptance I submit detailed mathematical proofs. Dear JOURNAL, please except my proposal of friendship. I would like to be your friend, please except me. Please. Dear JOURNAL, you are beautiful like the free mustang. Please let me just a second take a "ride on you". Information about me is in "Google".

Dear Dr. Martila, JOURNAL has received your message. JOURNAL, being a well-known and respected journal must insist on that in order to make fair and 
 legally correct decisions, no personal relations like friendship 
 can be possible or allowed. Asking JOURNAL to become friends, with the 
 obvious goal to publish in JOURNAL, is not far from bribery! JOURNAL does 
 not make any promises. Decisions made by JOURNAL are made on the basis 
 of its rules. Once made they are final. Please note that this is the last message sent to you by JOURNAL. JOURNAL will not consider any further correspondence or submission on this or related subjects Thank you fo ryour understanding Mr F. Staff Editor

I wrote a NOTE: The micro black holes need the Quantum Gravity.

There are papers on "micro black holes" (MBH) in the LHC experiment. But all they are wrong. Indeed, the word "micro" refers to the Quantum physics, and "black hole" refers to Gravity. So, we need the Quantum Gravity. But the full theory of Quantum Gravity (near the micro black hole) is considered to be unknown. But this is only because the impersonal treatment of unfriendly, too often peer-reviewed journals repels the gifted papers. I've got the Quantum Gravity! But I'm waiting for the JOURNAL to publish this introductory letter/note.
You argue, that some MBH could be too “macro” to be quantum objects?
Then, is well known, that huge carbon C60 fullerene molecular (buckyball) behaves in the famous double-slit experiment completely in the quantum way.
Communication with journals on this NOTE:                ISSN 0295-5075 – [no answer]                ISSN 1550-7998 – [is not suitable for publication]
Another confirmation of the discovery

The „father” of the theory of gravitational waves is Weber. Thus, he is the biggest authority and lucky guy (as you will see below). From [5, 6] the centre of our Galaxy is huge black hole eating 1000 stars per year (assuming Joseph Weber’s gravitational detectors truly receive the signals). Of course other experimental groups don’t recognise the signals, but Weber cylinders could be a very lucky device, accidentally putted in the resonance with gravitational waves from the Galaxy centre (1660 Hz).
But because of my discovery, the black hole could eat not 1000 stars, but 1000 asteroids/stones per year with same effect on Weber’s detector. Certainly, if stars and dust are hiding the Galaxy’s centre, then there are must be something “in between” – planets, asteroids, stones, comets. There’s the naked singularity!

Unified theory or major answer

There are continuously coming reports of processes, which seem to contradict with known laws of physics. Most famous yearly coming example is the lit of the Holly Fire. Entire journals are devoted to UFO-s. From astronomical observations we know wonders of exceeding of the velocity of light [4]. How one can explain this? Only being in the closed system, one can hope soon or later to explain everything, that happens there. We still do not have the unified theory of all interactions, widely known as the „Theory of everything”. But if this theory exists, and it describes really everything, then it must contain relations between our souls, angels, the God and the material world. The true unified theory unifies „heaven” and „earth”, like the everyday horizon. The known Universe is not a closed system. You disagree on that? Oh, dear, please, you do not know what is dark matter and dark energy! But they unarguably exist. Thus, you have not seen the Entire System, the closed one.

I’m being rejected everywhere on Earth. Why? I came to conclusion, that it because my papers are already accepted and published in heaven’s top journal (perhaps called „Daily Heaven” available for believers). And, as you know, if a top journal accepts the paper, it can not be published again elsewhere (in our „Nature” for example). Indeed, the system is closed, the same major rules are everywhere, and the major rule – a paper should be published only in one journal. So, it also means, that the papers accepted in our „Nature” are NOT PUBLISHED in the „Daily Heaven”. Thus, dear rejected authors, you have major reason to be very, very happy! Your life works are enjoing the angels!

Do we have souls? Majority says that. Indeed, what pains than the body is well, or what joys, than body pains? In any case the unification point is God, because He is the alpha and omega, the beginning and reason of everything. Please read in Bible [In. 1:1-5]. Official science (LHCollider) has called the wanted „unknown” as the „God Particle”. Perhaps, you shall treat this name more literally? In LHC we try to see the beginning of all (genesis). But majority of humankind is convinced that genesis is God. Can we see the God? Or the God Particle? Such unified theory of everything really promises EVERYTHING.

References
[1] Lightman A.P., Press W.H., Price R.H., Teukolsky S.A., Problem Book in Relativity and Gravitation (Princeton University, 1975)
[2] ru.wikipedia.org, en.wikipedia.org; Fulvio Melia, The Edge of Infinity. Supermassive Black Holes in the Universe (Cambridge University Press, 2003)
[3] Pankaj S. Joshi, Naked Singularities, Sci. Am. 300(2), 2009
[4] http://video.mail.ru/mail/diana009/12674/12686.html
Note the „bug” there -- spaceship won’t crash when it approaches the speed of light (like the particles in the LHCollider do not collapse to black holes)
[5] Raimo Keskinen and Heikki Oja, Mustaa aukkoa etsim;ss; (Tallinn, Valgus) 1983
[6] Joseph Weber, Physics today, Nov. 1975, page 15.